Thursday, March 26, 2015
Monday, March 23, 2015
Thursday, March 19, 2015
March 19th City Council Work Session Notes
On Thursday,
March 19, 2015 the City of Huntington City Council met for work session. About 31 people were in attendance; this
included three Huntington Police Officers and the mayor. A few members not in
attendance. The following notes are what we briefly discussed at the meeting:
-Pledge
- Reports and
reminders from the mayor:
·
Introduction
of Rick Edgar, new manager of Big Sandy:
o
Been
on job for week.
o
Plans
for big summer events
o
Making
connections in tow
o
Multiple
ways of recruiting
Concern with new
billing system at sanitary board
Problematic with
bills: 60 days behind, trying to catch up, loss and lack of communication, no
one will have the charge of lateness on the bill, a letter of explanation will
be sent out, 12 months to pay, no late fee, no termination, meeting next week
to further discuss the matter, should have been handled differently, new
billing cycle to catch up, not to worry, talking to everyone that calls in,
software issues, were told the current software is what was needed and we had
to adapt, not going to happen next time, citizens are the customers, high
compliments to the staff for taking care of issues.
#5: Business
sidewalks and the removal of snow issues- businesses need to keep them clean
and clear for safety reasons.
#6: Amending
sections: charter- brings in line with current legislation: Chapter 8 Article
4: 8-24 is now 8-8.
#7: Payment of
municipal fees for members of council: have the fees and bills withheld from
members of council’s wages until it is caught up
#8: 9-51
ordinance fee-exemption for low income renters, clarifies that landlords of low
income renters can claim exemption are taking advantage of this policy, needs
to be rectified.
#9: Planning
commission and house keeping ordinances/charters to be caught up with current
code
#10: March 9
meeting- recommended by state: 3 changes to ordinances:
o
Addition
of definitions and terms
o
Clarification
on elevations
o
Attributing
on preferences
#11: Resolution
of City Hall renovations, 100th anniversary coming up, volunteer
work on construction saved money, take up of floorings and removal of glue
costs, still have over $55,000 for renovations in foundation funds, agreement
with one crew that worked on Visual Arts Center to remove flooring and glue at
$21,000, 1985 was last renovation yea on building.
#12: Douglas
Center Update: Mr. Runyon, finance director, volunteers as president of
Ebenezer Outreach Clinic, 3 clinics in building, dental, medical and pharmacy,
multiple tenants, non-profits, Marshall to purchase to operate, to add offices
as well, proceeds to pay off loan, adds $130,000 back into the organization’s
budget, approved transaction in April, 50 year designation has to remain with
the historical integrity of structure of building, debt service of $780,000,
responsibility of building fall to Marshall and the state or city, Outreach
will continue to pay it’s share of the rent.
#13: General
Fund Budget: Saturday a resolution to be made for 2015-2016 to be adjusted to
add revenues and expenses for two items: collection of $265,000 extra, $455,00 more
for extra paving making budget $1 million, rest of budget proposed stays same.
NOTE* Reads different because of state revenue: adopt to meet language of
Charleston, special assessments, elections in line wiggle room for more
adjustments to budget, 27th is when it is due.
Thursday, March 12, 2015
Dr. Brooks Interview Transcribe (Library Beat Update)
Dr. Monica
Garcia-Brooks Interview Transcribe:
“The bad news is
that over the last five or six years we’ve had cuts, as I mentioned we have
lost about 20 percent of our overall buying power, with combination of cuts and
inflation. Because publishers have forced publisher inflation and we don’t get
to negotiate with that because they have a monopoly on several of the titles.
In fact that one publisher has the most significant lock on all the science,
technology, engineering and medical journals in the world. The own something
like 20 percent of everything that is published in the world. So if you are an
engineer and you like the number one journal in your field because you’re
teaching your students and you want them to have access to this information
there’s only one publisher that we can get that journal from, and they can
decide how much they want to charge us. It’s a little bit frustrating. (The
publisher is Elsevier Publishing, a Dutch company.) The good news is that the
university has been working on a whole new budget model, and the chief
financial officer has been working with information technology to address the
inflation issues for the library. So we are very hopeful that the inflation
will be addressed for 2016 and beyond and the library will no longer have to
make cuts because of journal inflation. We are excited about that. We are probably over time going to recover
what we have lost, but we can’t do it overnight because some of the materials
are really expensive. But as new programs are created at the university, now
there is the process of where some of the programs write into their budget. So
if we start a new program that requires an expensive journal then the deans and
chairs and program coordinators who are establishing that program work with us to
make sure they get current pricing information, and they know long term what
the projected cost will be and they can write it into the program. At the
committee meeting we reported that we were working on these things, but we at
the time did not have the concrete numbers and figures, so it is kind of a
bummer we think. There were two areas in the Health and Sciences Library, which
is under the medical school; they had two big packages of journals JAMA and
portion of their STEM packages that they were scared that they would not be
able to renew, and the next day we got word that they were able to. I would say
the library is on an upswing because the new budget process will now address
some critical needs; especially inflation and we are now involved in the
establishment of programs creation and development. We write that and we base
it on all the expenditures from the previous year, and each year the library
vendor will help us aggregate all of our subscriptions, in this case its EBSCO,
and they will provide a projection of what they think inflation will be for the
upcoming year and that’s what we base our projected costs on. For this upcoming
year we are projecting a six percent increase in inflation. And we EBSCO gives
us a projection, it’s an average, so it’s possible some journals won’t increase
at all, others might increase by 12 percent, and there will be some in the
middle at around five or six percent. We have to balance all these things in
determining the cuts.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

